jump to navigation

G.C. Petitions: Don’t Talk Bad ‘Bout Mary April 23, 2008

Posted by jimmorrow in Devo Thoughts.
Tags: ,
add a comment

This is among my favorite petitions for General Conference:

Resolve Not To Impugn Mary Magdalene
WHEREAS, the clergy of the United Methodist Church spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and
WHEREAS, Mary Magdalene, who was healed by the casting out of seven demons by Jesus and is a component of the Gospel story ( Mark 16: 9; Luke 8:2) ,   and
WHEREAS, women with whom Mary Magdalene kept company included Mary, mother of Jesus, and other women of good reputation and she and some of these women traveled with Jesus in His  proclaiming the good news of the kingdom of God (Matthew 27: 55-56, 61; 28:1;  Mark 15: 40, 47; 16:1; Luke: 8:2-3; 24:10;  John 19:25), and
WHEREAS, Mary Magdalene supported them from her own means, ministered to Jesus, was at the crucifixion, and was the first person to whom Jesus appeared after His resurrection ( Matthew 27:55-56, 28:1; Mark 16: 1, 9;  Luke 8:2-3;  John 20:1, 13-14) and
WHEREAS, there is nothing in the Books of the Gospel to indicate that Mary Magdalene  was a “sinner” or a “prostitute” [Harnish, James A., A Son Is Given: Witness to the Resurrection (scriptures for the church seasons), p. 63, unknown binding, 1996; Knight, Kevin (Ed.), “St. Mary Magdalene,” Catholic Encyclopedia, on line at www.newadvent.org <http://www.newadvent.org> : 2006 version], and
WHEREAS, in the year 591, in a sermon given to monks at the Basilica San Clemente in Rome, Pope Gregory misidentified Mary Magdalene as a sinner and prostitute and that castigation became a tradition in the Roman Catholic (but not in Eastern Churches) and Protestant churches (Carroll, James, “Who Was Mary Magdalene?” The Smithsonian, pp. 117-119, Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution, June 2006; Darman, Jonathan, “Religion: Who Was Mary Magdalene?”, Newsweek/MSNBC, on line at www.msnbc.msn.com <http://www.msnbc.msn.com> ., pp. 3-4 (2007); Collins, Father Raymond F., “Mary,” Holy Company: Christian Heroes and Heroines, Elliott Wright, Ed., p. 580, New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.: 1982), and
WHEREAS, there is nothing for which reason Mary Magdalene should be confused with the woman in Nain who was a “sinner,” Mary of Bethany, or any woman who was a prostitute (see, Luke 7:11, 37-48, 10-38-42; John 8:3-11, 11:1-2), and
WHEREAS, in 1969, the Roman Catholic Church abandoned Pope Gregory’s characterization of Mary Magdalene with the reform of the Roman Missal and the Roman Calendar (Collins, Ibid.; Darman, Ibid.;  Newsweek/MSNBC, on line at www.msnbc.msn.com <http://www.msnbc.msn.com> .,
pp. 3-4 (2007); Filteau, Jerry, “Scholars Setting Record Straight on Mary Magdalene,” Catholic News, Washington, D.C., May 1, 2006 and www.cathnews.com/news/605/23.php <http://www.cathnews.com/news/605/23.php> ); Pinksky,
Mark I., “Something about Mary Magdalene,” reprinted from the Orlando Sentinel, Atlanta, Georgia: The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, March 6, 2004, pp. B 1-2], and
WHEREAS, those of the Protestant faith, including Methodist, have regrettably continued the tradition of sinner and prostitute and have perpetuated it, especially as part of the Easter story [Willimon, William H. and Patricia P. Willimon, Eds., The International Lesson Annual, 1992-1993, Nashville: Abingdon Press (1992), p. 254]  and
WHEREAS, our clergy need not step on the back of another person to convince others to accept the Gospel message, and
WHEREAS, the clergy of the United Methodist Church should be advised of the origin and error of the tradition and should be counseled against repeating it,
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved that our clergy not impugn Mary Magdalene’s reputation by referring to her as a sinner or prostitute.

Seminary: What I Expected, What I Got April 23, 2008

Posted by jimmorrow in Devo Thoughts.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

On the seminary note, goingtoseminary.com has an interesting post about a a dissertation by Charles R. DeGroat who teaches at Reformed Theological Seminary (RTS).

The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between expectations formed in seminary and the relationship to the reality experienced within the pastorate.

Here are some key thoughts of some subjects in the study:

  • I had to do a funeral three weeks into my first gig in ministry and I didn’t have freaking clue what to do.
  • I wish I learned more about a number of practical ministry things - Weddings. Pastoral counseling. A dude’s kid was molested at one point, and I thought “some good my class notes are for this.” I mean, are you getting the disconnect?
  • I expected that I’d grow spiritually in seminary. I didn’t. And then, I expected that I’d grow spiritually after seminary. And that happened a little. But it mostly didn’t happen. Because the busyness just doesn’t stop. You move from the busyness of papers and essays and exams to the busyness of getting a job to the busyness of preparing for ordination to the busyness of phone calls and hospital visits and teachings and kids being born and interviews with guys like you.
  • If I could say one thing to the seminary, I’d say it’s no use graduating pastors who know how to pass an exam but are spiritually dead.
  • And now I’m realizing that, as I reflect on my seminary experience, is that it was just too much information to absorb and process. So, you scramble to perform to pass tests, and to get credentialed, and to become a preacher. My seminary experience became a means to an end.
  • Nothing in seminary helped with the relational difficulties I’d experience in ministry. The bulk of it I gained in my first ministry position. I saw the level of pain, level of fragmentation, level of brokenness in people’s lives.
  • I didn’t realize how much emotionally energy this (ministry) would require. It’s gigantic.
  • Seminary provided important information for theological and ecclesiastical exams, but not for ministering to broken people.
  • I spend far more time, for good or bad, worrying over how to deal with conflict, or help marriages on the brink of disaster or the best way to accommodate more people, or how to get a group of men who are all older than I, and whom I fear a bit, to get on the same page about something, all relational sorts of things than I do about the exegesis of particular passages of scripture.
  • It is awfully tempting to give one’s time and energy to the things that make it look like you are on the job. I don’t believe I had a good sense of just how much this would be a temptation.

The whole study can be found here.

A large hat tip to goingtoseminary.com.

Read the rest of the post here.

Post Modern Essay Generator April 23, 2008

Posted by jimmorrow in Devo Thoughts.
add a comment

For all of your post modern essay needs! Simply click here and you will be furnished with a unique, brand-new post modern essay complete with citations! Check out my essay that I plan to turn into Dr. Jim Hampton next week:

The Narrative of Failure: Cultural objectivism in the works of Lynch

Jane Buxton Jim Morrow

Department of English, Miskatonic University, Arkham, Mass. Asbury Theological Seminary

1.  Marxist class and precapitalist theory

“Class is part of the fatal flaw of sexuality,” says Bataille; however, according to Long, it is not so much class that is part of the fatal flaw of sexuality, but rather the absurdity, and hence the futility, of class. Sartre’s essay on precapitalist theory suggests that consensus is created by communication.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a that includes narrativity as a reality. Lacan uses the term ‘Marxist class’ to denote the role of the artist as observer.

In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a that includes language as a whole. The primary theme of the works of Rushdie is not discourse as such, but postdiscourse.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a that includes art as a reality. Bataille suggests the use of cultural objectivism to deconstruct and modify sexual identity.

2. Narratives of paradigm

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the concept of neotextual narrativity. However, the subject is interpolated into a that includes language as a paradox. Hanfkopf states that we have to choose between dialectic sublimation and subcultural textual theory.

The main theme of Hanfkopf’s model of cultural objectivism is a self-sufficient whole. Therefore, any number of theories concerning precapitalist theory may be discovered. Foucault promotes the use of semioticist substructural theory to attack hierarchy.

“Class is responsible for capitalism,” says Debord. Thus, in The Ground Beneath Her Feet, Rushdie reiterates precapitalist theory; in Midnight’s Children, however, he affirms capitalist desemioticism. Lyotard suggests the use of Marxist class to analyse sexual identity.

In a sense, the primary theme of the works of Rushdie is the role of the poet as reader. Marx uses the term ‘cultural objectivism’ to denote a pretextual totality.

But the subject is contextualised into a that includes consciousness as a reality. Capitalist situationism suggests that sexuality is capable of intention.

In a sense, many narratives concerning the role of the artist as writer exist. Lacan’s essay on Marxist class holds that expression comes from the masses.

Thus, the subject is interpolated into a that includes consciousness as a totality. An abundance of sublimations concerning the posttextual paradigm of discourse may be revealed.


1. Long, B. (1979) Cultural objectivism in the works of Rushdie. O’Reilly & Associates 2. Hanfkopf, M. A. ed. (1995) Discourses of Stasis: Cultural objectivism, Sartreist

existentialism and rationalism. Schlangekraft

3. Hanfkopf, L. (1989) Cultural objectivism and Marxist class. Loompanics


Get your own post modern essay here!